Honzuki no Gekokujou: Ryoushu no Youjo, episode 24

banner image

Related Communities

Alternative Names

Ascendance of a Bookworm Season 4, Honzuki no Gekokujou: Shisho ni Naru Tame ni wa Shudan wo Erandeiraremasen 4th Season, 本好きの下剋上 司書になるためには手段を選んでいられません 第4期


Additional Links

Reminder: Please do not discuss plot points not yet seen or skipped in the show. Failing to follow the rules may result in a ban.


All discussions

Episode Link Episode Link
1 Link 14 Link
2 Link 15 Link
3 Link 16 Link
4 Link 17 Link
5 Link 18 Link
6 Link 19 Link
7 Link 20 Link
8 Link 21 Link
9 Link 22 Link
10 Link 23 Link
11 Link 24 Link
12 Link
13 Link

This post was created by a bot. Message the mod team for feedback and comments. The original source code can be found on GitHub.

  • BillyClark@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    For this episode… why did grandpa become comically dumb for that scene? A strange bit of slapstick comedy, I suppose.

    That’s a bit of wtf from the anime’s perspective, but Bonifatius is supposed to have always been like that. He’s a musclehead who doesn’t completely realize his own strength, especially when he’s emotional. But unlike, say Angelica, he’s not really even normally that much of an idiot. It’s just like he has this big blind spot, and that’s why you heard in this episode that he was warned off of touching Rozemyne, who would be easy for him to accidentally kill, just randomly.

    In this episode, it wasn’t animated for obvious reasons, but when Bonifatius punched the attacker in the hallway, it actually bashed his head completely in, and IIRC, that guy’s body struck and killed another attacker. He basically just killed them because he was upset and there were enough of them that killing some wouldn’t make a difference. And again unanimated for obvious reasons, when he unmasked Joisontak, he is supposed to have accidentally ripped off part of his face.

    If I’m following correctly, I think the use of the secret passage is the first piece of evidence that specifically indicts Georgine as assisting in the immoral schemes of the pro-Georgine nobles.

    That’s not absolutely proven to the Archduke’s family, so they don’t really have that evidence. If they did have the evidence, they’d have executed two nobles instead of one. So, really, the use of that passage is only a supposition that has been animated just for the audience. And from the audience’s perspective, we already have seen some of the immoral schemes of pro-Georgine nobles, like their plotting against Wilfried.