If my monsters are imagined, why do they trigger the motion sensor lights?

  • 46 Posts
  • 591 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: February 10th, 2024

help-circle









  • In episode 3, Being-X is talking to her in the form of this Nutcracker sitting on the nightstand in a house they are occupying. Ever since then, Being-X has been showing up as this Nutcracker. The more interesting question is, whether or not this is the very same Nutcracker from back then since Viktoriya specifically mentioned that it’s from a house they used to occupy. That line makes me think that Being-X is fucking around with probabilities again to “keep in touch”. (Or it’s an anime original Easter egg. If the LN wasn’t so god-awful we can never know.)





  • I like that they’re trying to use dialogue / inner monologue to characterize Victoria, but it feels hamfisted sometimes.

    They are reducing her thoughts quite a bit here. This is to be expected for an anime adaptation, but I feel like they reduce it more than usual here. On one hand, I am pleased that there aren’t extensive scenes of just inner monologue exposition. On the other hand, they cut now so much that a lot of her character and motivations are lost, and I agree that it feels hamfisted. As @Polkira@piefed.ca mentioned, she feels now “too perfect” without getting the exposition in her inner thoughts about why she is so perfect. Her character in the anime also feels less unfortunate. Maybe they will go into more detail in the next episodes so I’m not saying more in case of spoilers, but at this point in the LN it’s already clear to the reader that not everything is mirth and carefree wonder.







  • The hollywood “adaptation” shits all over GitS

    I hate that one as well.

    It’s not for you. But its hardly offensive to the franchise.

    That depends on what you define as “the franchise”. If you define it as “the manga”, this might well be true. But if you see the franchise as “the old anime movie and series”, then it’s a different discussion. The themes in GitS exist in a lot of works that aren’t GitS. What defines the franchise is not its themes alone but a combination of all the aspects it’s made of. The underlying themes are just one of those. And I would argue that the tone and art style are a lot more defining in this particular series than some esoteric plot points. The art style and tone of the 1995 GitS movie, as well as Bladerunner, have been a defining feature of the entire cyberpunk genre. So, from my point of view, this is definitely offensive to the franchise. It’s like turning John Wick into a pastel colored show about a petting zoo and saying that it’s still the same because the theme of him liking dogs is still intact.

    Also, just to reiterate, even if it weren’t GitS I wouldn’t like it. It’s not “uhh, it doesn’t look like the movie, so I don’t like it”. It’s “I don’t like it because everything about it is shit AND on top of that, it doesn’t even share the aesthetics of the movie”. I honestly can’t understand how someone could like this first episode. Exposition, plot, pacing, narration, animation, score, cinematography, editing. It was all over the place. It’s just not a good episode. And it’s an even worse GitS episode.