You can always just use the original image URL from bluesky or twitter, then you technically never reuploaded it and only embedded it. Then those sites can see peoples traffic however which is a different issue.
The reason I create reuploads is, that these are scaled versions. Some of my posts are from pretty big images which would suck up traffic for people just scrolling through the feed.
The original image is linked at the bottom of my posts (except for Pixiv, as their link are only valid when embedded in Pixiv itself), so the original source sites will see traffic at least from people who open my posts.
Lmao at the fact it says “do not reupload my art” in the watermark
I didn’t notice it until I saw the image as the big preview in my feed.
I’m kinda undecided, on the one hand the message is clear, on the other hand this should do no harm and the artist is cited properly.
You can always just use the original image URL from bluesky or twitter, then you technically never reuploaded it and only embedded it. Then those sites can see peoples traffic however which is a different issue.
The reason I create reuploads is, that these are scaled versions. Some of my posts are from pretty big images which would suck up traffic for people just scrolling through the feed. The original image is linked at the bottom of my posts (except for Pixiv, as their link are only valid when embedded in Pixiv itself), so the original source sites will see traffic at least from people who open my posts.