randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoAnd I thought that I had already seen the worst date format.i.vgy.meimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1643arrow-down113
arrow-up1630arrow-down1imageAnd I thought that I had already seen the worst date format.i.vgy.merandint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz to Programmer Humor@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squareKata1yst@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up14arrow-down5·1 year agoI hope you mean RFC 3339 instead of that non-authoritative ISO crap 😤
minus-squareRacoonVegetable@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 year agoYou mean the standard defined by The Internet Engineering Task Force? Of course I do! The ISO name is just more popular.
minus-squareSkull giver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up15arrow-down1·1 year agoThe two overlap, but are not the same. Annoyingly, neither supports y-m-d h:i:s which is the format most pretend-ISO/RFC people like to use.
minus-squareazimir@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 year agoLove the smell of a good standards body fight in the morning (0900 GMT+0).
minus-squareRacoonVegetable@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·1 year agoYou mean 1694768400 in Unix timestamp?
minus-squareazimir@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year agoAh! A Raccoon and/or Vegetable of culture! I tip my fedora to you and your one true time representation and storage system.
I hope you mean RFC 3339 instead of that non-authoritative ISO crap 😤
You mean the standard defined by The Internet Engineering Task Force? Of course I do! The ISO name is just more popular.
The two overlap, but are not the same.
Annoyingly, neither supports y-m-d h:i:s which is the format most pretend-ISO/RFC people like to use.
I am going to cry.
Love the smell of a good standards body fight in the morning (0900 GMT+0).
You mean 1694768400 in Unix timestamp?
Ah! A Raccoon and/or Vegetable of culture! I tip my fedora to you and your one true time representation and storage system.
tips debian