Hope they don’t start gutting budgets, loading up the balance sheet with debt, and siphoning off profits.
Oh, they will.
Hope they don’t start gutting budgets, loading up the balance sheet with debt, and siphoning off profits.
Oh, they will.
Yes. Knives can also be used as screwdrivers for fasteners with a “blade” or “flat” head.
I loathe linter errors. If you know that I did it wrong and how, just fix it and stop wasting everyone’s time. That’s why I’m in favor of opinionated formatters in the per-commit automation. No point in wasting everyone’s time and making silly merge conflicts possible.
Sure but I’m not sure that most HR management software companies are going to be keen on handing over source for you to review.
5/7 Software package is pure garbage. Tim forgot to remove his TODO comment from line 1052 of main and there are three instances of inconsistent indentation in the API module. Therefore, our automation pipeline has marked our own employees as “needs improvement”.
Just use an opinionated code formatter in your per-commit automation. Fewer people get cut and noone gets sick with linting issues.
FUSE has entered the chat.
How so?
I think that, perhaps, the user is trying to use Lemmy as Reddit, rather than using some of the fantastic quality of life improvements that evaporated with the API nonsense.
For example, blocking users and communities (and soon instances). Some users and communities, even if I enjoy them or the instances that they are on, sometimes are just too toxic for me. And that isn’t to say that the comms and users necessarily are (sometimes they are) but, that sometimes engaging with some comms and users either causes undue stress or temptation to get involved in an Internet fight. That’s not behavior that is good for us, even if it sometimes feels good in the moment.
I’m hoping (and have suggested) that a “timeout” feature gets added to allow one to readily self-regulate and disengage when they find that interactions are approaching the sorts that are algorithmically encouraged on commercial social media platforms. The outrage machine is just terrible and I’ve found myself much happier and in a better headspace since leaving such platforms. Added bonus is that transphobia actually gets taken seriously on most instances and, while it doesn’t technically impact my as a cis guy, I’m much happier knowing that people are able to feel safer to be themselves (or come to terms with themselves).
As for the complaint about people being more likely pedantic or correct people on technical details, I love that - finding out that I’m wrong about something is fantastic because that means that I learned something. When there’s topics, like tech, where there are often correct and incorrect answers and they change or get added to regularly, one really needs to leave the ego at the door. We’re all humans (and bots and human facsimiles), which means we’ll be wrong from time to time. It’s a fact of life, effectively in environments where there are a lot of knowledge-workers and the medium of communication is directly related to the topics.
Personally, I’d like to see more comms regarding to digital circuit design and open-source silicon.
Semi-extroverted programmer here. While I can see how this might be useful in a world where programming is a multimedia craft, if I can’t open it in plain vi, keep it the fuck out of my source code.
That wasn’t in the initial reqs. And, supposing the hardware was good to go, about the same as AWS.
ETA: The time/click savings is more likely to be in maintenance because using a cloud service is just paying someone else to do that for you.
Yes. Because I intentionally design systems to avoid vendor lock-in by, at the very least, including a plan to export data and keep IaC in a repo so that it can be used to redeploy at either another vendor or colo-based servers.
Here’s some good tools to do so:
There’s a ton of other possibilities but FOSS and source-availabile licensed software makes it pretty straightforward (though still time-consuming as no infra is fully cloud agnostic due to non-standardization between the big three in infra primitives).
A few ideas:
Sorry, merge conflict :(
But, has had support for his creation purged from the kernel.
Idiomatic Go way of checking for the presence of a key in a map.
Thank you. That’s what I get for writing a drawn-out shitpost program on my phone over several hours while away from home, instead of in a few minutes in vim.
var LogicGate = map[string]string{
"OR": "OR",
"AND": "AND",
"NOT": "NOT",
"NOR": "NOR",
"NAND": "NOR",
"XOR": "XOR",
}
func isLogicGate(inString string) (bool) {
_, ok := LogicGate[strings.ToUpper(inString)]
if ok {
return true
} else {
return false
}
}
func stringAsGateLogic(inString string) (bool, error) {
inSplit := strings.Split(inString, " ")
var phrase1 strings.Builder
var phrase2 stringa.Builder
var gateString string
for word := range inSplit {
if isLogicGate(word) {
if len(gateString) < 1{
gateString = word
} else {
phrase2.WriteString(word)
}
} else {
if len(gateString) < 1{
phrase1.WriteString(word)
} else {
phrase2.WriteString(word)
}
}
}
boolPhrase1 := bool(phrase1.String())
boolPhrase2 := bool(phrase2.String())
switch strings.ToUpper(gateString) {
case "OR":
return (boolPhrase1 || boolPhrase2), nil
case "AND":
return (boolPhrase1 && boolPhrase2), nil
case "NOT":
return (!boolPhrase2), nil
case "NOR":
return (!(boolPhrase1 || boolPhrase2)), nil
case "NAND":
return (!(boolPhrase1 && boolPhrase2)
case "XOR":
orRes := (boolPhrase1 || boolPhrase2)
nandRes := (!(boolPhrase1 && boolPhrase2))
return (orRes && nandRes), nil
default:
return false, fmt.Errorf("Why you do dis?: %v", inString)
}
}
func main(){
answer, err := stringAsGateLogic ("This person misunderstands a beautiful function code can be very sexy or maybe I'm a odd girl.")
if err != nil {
fmt.Println(err)
}
fmt.Println(answer)
}
Hah! I like Solarized Dark for my shell and a Gruvbox-derived theme for Neovim. Solarized Dark is easy enough on the eyes and immediately differentiated from the Gruvbox pallette.
Midriff and motorcycles don’t mix. ATGATT.