• 0 Posts
  • 16 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 2nd, 2023

help-circle




  • SkyNTP@lemmy.mltoLemmy@lemmy.mlLemmy is being gentrified
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    To compare that to being a refugee speaks volumes about your entitlement and privilege.

    Obviously the term is being used in a wholly different context. Comments like these make me think you are just trying to pick a fight instead of listening to the grievances.

    Some of us are here because we believe in community-driven projects, and reddit is shutting those down, so yeah, we are being kicked out against our will. So no, this isn’t just about favourite meme factory.

    Political refugees are a serious issue. Feel free to disagree with me, but I don’t think gatekeeping the word “Refugee” as used in a totally different context is particularly productive. It is no more of armchair effort than what you decry.

    As for the complaints about defederation… This is just noise. If you don’t like it or want to stay small, why not just… defederate? Isn’t that the point?



  • Yes and no. Society has always been fractured in ways that limit discourse. Prisons, psychiatric institutes, universities, bourgeoisie, NCO/CO, private dwellings, municipailities, nation states. So a bit of separation is okay.

    Arguably the digital space magnifies this effect. And fair enough. But then I would argue:

    The internet is already defederated by default. Extremists already congregate on forums that are completely isolated. Facebook users are walled off from YouTube users, etc.

    The Fediverse doesn’t exacerbate the separation that already exists. The opposite is true. The Fediverse is the one technology that is providing technical means for interconnection across groups.





  • The last paragraph you quoted is in reference to individual responsability and how they access the data. It’s equivalent to saying “don’t look at at this Fediverse post: you are GDPR compliant!”. This only helps you in litigation. We both know that says nothing of where the data can exist. And this is true for any federated system, including email.

    It’s also completely asinine. Suddenly we need to burn snail mail after reading it? Why receive any mail at all if everything is a giant piece of liability? There’s a social contract in communication: a certain assumption that if you give someone a piece of informtion, you are doing just that: giving, not lending. “Lending information” upsets the social structure. GDPR has to be tempered in reality, and this starts even before the fediverse.

    Like I said, GDPR is imperfect. It was written in the context of and solves a problem created by centralized institutions and large beaurocracies. It is also completely unenforceable in a decentralized system. It hardly seems relevant anyway.

    Realisticalpy speaking, those tempered interpretations are probably already existant, and there is already enough precedent for this to be a nothing burger.





  • I say that as a diehard Firefox user myself, who’s been pushing back against Chrome hedgemony ever since it’s market share dominance. Not just for ideological reasons, but I happen to think the interface is slicker and the features are better…

    But let’s remember the topic at hand though: reaching out to people for whom technical reasons such as why Firefox is superior to Chrome either go over their head or they just don’t care. And that’s most people. That’s just a reality check.