I didn’t make it past their definition of corruption. Shaping policies to help your investments and using insider knowledge to help you make investments is 100% corruption. It is not equivalent to “celebrity endorsement, book deal, speaking fee, and brand partnership.”

That this person can’t even identify what corruption is is a massive problem, assuming they are just misinformed. At worst, it’s trying to normalize corruption.

Couldn’t get to the end. I got dumber as it went on until I could no longer read.